Software errors can quietly undermine digital humanities research, but code review — a standard quality-control practice in software engineering — is hard to do when most DH developers work alone or in teams of one to three. This paper shares progress and insights from an effort to establish a community code review process for digital humanities, and makes the case for why it matters.
Read the paper
- Authors: Julia Damerow, Rebecca Sutton Koeser, Jeffrey C. Carver, and Malte Vogl
- Journal: Digital Scholarship in the Humanities (2024)
- DOI: 10.1093/llc/fqae052
- Featured image: figure from the paper (the community code review process)
